<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
<channel>
	<generator>Vivvo CMS 4.1</generator>
	<title>BrownPenguin.com</title>
	<link>http://brownpenguin.com/</link>
	<copyright>&amp;copy;2007 Spoonlabs d.o.o.</copyright>
	
	
			
				
					<item>
						
							<title>Wikipedia Approaches 3 Million Article Mark</title>
							<link>http://brownpenguin.com/social-media/wikipedia-with-3-million-articles.html</link>
							<category>Social Media</category>
							<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
							<description>One of the most popular websites in the world, Wikipedia, is close to breaking the barrier of an unprecedented three million articles in its database. </description>
							
						
					</item>
					
							
								
									<item>
										<title>vishakan bhoopathi</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>ya i know &lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia anyone can add to or edit. A highly popular resource, Wikipedia has become a primary research tool of college students, and it may help them develop comparative research skills. However, since Wikipedia’s entries don’t undergo verified expert review, many academics are concerned about its use for academic purposes.</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>ruchi</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>well i truely agree to what all is said above no doubt we can have better work done by more number of people not even the work gets divided but also we get different opinions and thoughts</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>ricky</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>no doubt even the worst of person has something good with him or her just what differs is how you take it</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>jane</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>two persons cannot have opinions beating millions of people then however intelligent they may be</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>niki</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>when we talk of encyclopedia the thing that comes to mind is interesting and unmatched details which itself says that one person cannot do this tedious task</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>sakshi</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>i agree because wikipedia in itself has proved that what millions can do was not possible for him alone</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>ankit</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>in my personal opinion i truely agree to wikipedia he himself changed the history which is not a easy task</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>jessica</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>its again a double edged sword because what can be done by an scientist alone cannot be dont by an individual .</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>panku</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>sites are loosing is importance not because of wikipedia but till the time he was there he did his job but now no one is there to keep up his name</description>
									</item>
								
									<item>
										<title>deepak</title>
										
										<category>Social Media</category>
										<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
										<description>wikipedia started slowly and reached million n when millions were together then how can this loose its importance in day or two just with age the number is decreasing ans hence the importance</description>
									</item>
								
							
						
				
			
		




<description>BrownPenguin.com</description>
</channel>
</rss>